Friends, I stumbled upon an anonymous edit suggestion yesterday in the review system which was actually good, but I went for not sure. I decided to not accept it because there was no user info, although the contribution was valid.

IMHO I think that editing things from other users is a risky contract, so my suggestion is to consider edits made by registered people here. Thoughts? :)

Edit: I forgot to mention that the edit was major (not only formatting).

share
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 23 down vote accepted

I don't see why the source of the edit should really be of concern if you have reason enough to think that the edit is helpful. For me, the issue with major edits is mainly if they significantly change the question or answer, (even if good) in which case I'm inclined to be conservative on accepting them. In that case maybe the provenance of the edit might come into play.

share
    
Great point, Alan. Thanks. :) –  Paulo Cereda Oct 22 '12 at 20:58
3  
+1, afaik our standard for acceptable edits still is meta.tex.stackexchange.com/questions/340/… –  doncherry Oct 22 '12 at 23:08
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .