Googling a phrase from Which font is the most comfortable for on-screen viewing? brings up three other sites featuring the same question:


Hyperlinks removed by doncherry so that bots don’t think these links are worth following, cf.

I knew that all SE user content is "licensed" under something called "cc-wiki license", which, as the SE blog explains, requires that the re-user

  1. Shows that content is from SE and hyperlinks to the original question,
  2. Shows the question/answer/comment posters' names and hyperlinks to their SE profiles.

FAQ Overflow fulfills these requirements, while the other two don't. So what can/should we do?

add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 29 down vote accepted

They can be reported on Meta Stack Overflow - ZQNA was already added by @doncherry:

Report sites that use SE content without following attribution rules here

add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .