Googling a phrase from Which font is the most comfortable for on-screen viewing? brings up three other sites featuring the same question:


Hyperlinks removed by doncherry so that bots don’t think these links are worth following, cf.

I knew that all SE user content is "licensed" under something called "cc-wiki license", which, as the SE blog explains, requires that the re-user

  1. Shows that content is from SE and hyperlinks to the original question,
  2. Shows the question/answer/comment posters' names and hyperlinks to their SE profiles.

FAQ Overflow fulfills these requirements, while the other two don't. So what can/should we do?

up vote 29 down vote accepted

They can be reported on Meta Stack Overflow - ZQNA was already added by @doncherry:

Report sites that use SE content without following attribution rules here


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .